Colchicine-intolerant familial mediterranean fever patients: A comparative study between different colchicine doses and IL-1 inhibitor monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is the most common monogenic autoinflammatory disease. Colchicine is the primary treatment for FMF, although some patients do not respond well or are unable to tolerate it. For these patients, the addition of interleukin-1 (IL-1) antagonists is the preferred option. However, the impact of colchicine treatment alongside the use of IL-1 antagonists remains unclear. METHODS: We recruited adult FMF patients who satisfied the Eurofever and Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization classification criteria and were receiving IL-1 antagonist treatment from our FMF cohort. All the patients exhibited colchicine intolerance or resistance. As per the FMF cohort protocol, the patients were longitudinally followed up, including assessments of their C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, autoinflammatory disease activity index (AIDAI), and autoinflammatory damage index (ADDI). RESULTS: Among the 125 patients (68 female and 57 male), 96 received a combination of IL-1 antagonists and the maximum tolerated dose of colchicine, whereas 29 were treated exclusively with IL-1 antagonists due to colchicine intolerance. The patients' inflammatory markers, AIDAI activity, and ADDI damage scores did not differ significantly between the two groups during the follow-up period. Notably, the drug retention rates were significantly higher in the patients treated solely with IL-1 antagonists. CONCLUSION: While the typical approach is to maintain colchicine treatment alongside the use of IL-1 antagonists, for patients who cannot tolerate effective colchicine doses, IL-1 antagonists alone may effectively control FMF disease activity.

Is compressed colchicine tablet superior to other colchicine preparations in patients with familial Mediterranean fever?

AIMS: The aim of our study is to evaluate the differences in effectiveness, dosage, and side effect profiles in the use of colchicine preparations and evaluate the superiority of compressed colchicine tablets in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients with resistance or intolerance to coated colchicine tablets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with FMF according to the Tel Hashomer criteria, aged 18 years and older, and switched from compressed colchicine to coated colchicine tablets in the rheumatology clinic of Gazi University were identified. The daily colchicine dose and FMF attack frequency before and after switching from coated colchicine tablets to compressed colchicine tablets were compared. RESULTS: The study included 43 female (72.9%) and 16 male patients (27.1%), and the mean age was 34.54 ± 8.3 years. The number of attacks per year was significantly reduced after switching to compressed colchicine tablets, and daily colchicine doses were lower after switching to compressed colchicine tablets (1.97 ± 0.23 vs 1.78 ± 0.39 mg, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compressed colchicine tablets were shown to be superior to other colchicine preparations and compressed colchicine tablets to be a useful treatment option before initiating biological agents in patients who were unresponsive to coated colchicine.

Does switching from coated colchicine to compressed colchicine improves treatment response in patients with familial Mediterranean fever?

AIM: To evaluate the treatment response to compressed colchicine tablets in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients with resistance or intolerance to coated colchicine. The secondary aim was to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of responders to compressed colchicine. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1574 pediatric patients with FMF treated at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital. Sixty-one patients did not respond to coated colchicine and were switched to compressed colchicine. In these patients, the number of attacks and the International Severity Score for FMF (ISSF) during the 6 months before and 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months after switching from coated colchicine to compressed colchicine were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve of 61 patients (19.7%) who were switched to compressed colchicine due to intolerance responded to treatment. Of the 49/61 patients (80.3%) who were switched due to uncontrolled attacks and persistent subclinical inflammation, 25 responded to treatment. The frequency of attacks and ISSF decreased after switching. At the end of the two-year follow-up, 42 patients responded to compressed colchicine, and 19 patients received compressed colchicine plus interleukin-1-targeting drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Compressed colchicine was shown to be a useful treatment option before initiating biological agents in non-responders to coated colchicine, especially those with side effects.

Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported colchicine may potentially prevent FMF attacks. For people who are colchicine-resistant or intolerant, drugs such as anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab might be beneficial. This is an update of the review last published in 2018. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in people with FMF. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and four Chinese databases on in August 2021. We searched clinical trials registries and references listed in relevant reports. The last search was 17 August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people with FMF, comparing active interventions (including colchicine, anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, thalidomide, tocilizumab, interferon-α and ImmunoGuard (herbal dietary supplement)) with placebo or no treatment, or comparing active drugs to each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology. We assessed certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 RCTs with 312 participants (aged three to 53 years), including five parallel and five cross-over designed studies. Six studies used oral colchicine, one used oral ImmunoGuard, and the remaining three used rilonacept, anakinra or canakinumab as a subcutaneous injection. The duration of each study arm ranged from one to eight months. There were inadequacies in the design of the four older colchicine studies and the two studies comparing a single to a divided dose of colchicine. However, the four studies of ImmunoGuard, rilonacept, anakinra and canakinumab were generally well-designed.  We aimed to report on the number of participants experiencing an attack, the timing of attacks, the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis, adverse drug reactions and the response of a number of biochemical markers from the acute phase of an attack; but no study reported on the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis. Colchicine (oral) versus placebo After three months, colchicine 0.6 mg three times daily may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks (risk ratio (RR) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.95; 1 study, 10 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study (20 participants) of colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily showed there may be no difference in the number of participants experiencing attacks at two months (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23; low-certainty evidence). There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence), or in the number of days between attacks: (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, one study reported loose stools and frequent bowel movements and a second reported diarrhea (narrative summary; both very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on acute-phase response. Rilonacept versus placebo There is probably no difference in the number of people experiencing attacks at three months (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.26; moderate-certainty evidence).  There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence) or in the number of days between attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, the rilonacept study reported there may be no differences in gastrointestinal symptoms, hypertension, headache, respiratory tract infections, injection site reactions and herpes, compared to placebo (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). The study narratively reported there may be no differences in acute-phase response indicators after three months (low-certainty evidence). ImmunoGuard versus placebo The ImmunoGuard study observed there are probably no differences in adverse effects (moderate-certainty evidence) or in acute-phase response indicators after one month of treatment (moderate-certainty evidence). No data were reported for the number of people experiencing an attack, duration of attacks or days between attacks. Anakinra versus placebo A study of anakinra given to 25 colchicine-resistant participants found there is probably no difference in the number of participants experiencing an attack at four months (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.07; moderate-certainty evidence).  There were no data for duration of attacks or days between attacks. There are probably no differences between anakinra and placebo with regards to injection site reaction, headache, presyncope, dyspnea and itching (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, anakinra probably reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) after four months (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). Canakinumab versus placebo Canakinumab probably reduces the number of participants experiencing an attack at 16 weeks (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.65; 1 study, 63 colchicine-resistant participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the duration of attacks or days between attacks. The included study reported the number of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years was probably 42.7 with canakinumab versus 97.4 with placebo among people with colchicine-resistant FMF (moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, canakinumab probably caused a higher proportion of participants to have a CRP level of 10 mg/L or less compared to placebo (68% with canakinumab versus 6% with placebo; 1 study, 63 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Colchicine single dose versus divided dose There is probably no difference in the duration of attacks at three months (MD -0.04 hours, 95% CI -10.91 to 10.83) or six months (MD 2.80 hours, 95% CI -5.39 to 10.99; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the number of participants experiencing an attack or days between attacks. There is probably no difference in adverse events (including anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting and elevated liver enzymes) between groups (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, there may be no evidence of a difference between groups (narrative summary; low- to moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There were limited RCTs assessing interventions for people with FMF. Based on the evidence, three times daily colchicine may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks, colchicine single dose and divided dose may not be different for children with FMF, canakinumab probably reduces the number of people experiencing attacks, and anakinra or canakinumab probably reduce CRP in colchicine-resistant participants; however, only a few RCTs contributed data for analysis. Further RCTs examining active interventions, not only colchicine, are necessary before a comprehensive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in FMF can be drawn.

Total Hip Joint Replacement in a Patient with Colchicine-Resistant Familial Mediterranean Fever under Canakinumab Treatment.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease characterized by recurrent episodes of fever and serositis. Periodic febrile attack can be managed with biologic medication in colchicine-resistant FMF patients, however, no reports or guidelines exist regarding the postoperative management of elective joint surgery in these patients. Although it is not clear how FMF attacks are triggered, they may be precipitated by stress including anesthesia or surgery. This study reports the case of a 51-year-old FMF patient who received total hip replacement under canakinumab (a specific interleukin-1ß monoclonal antibody) treatment. He had highly active FMF, which was resistant to colchicine; however, his recurrent febrile attack with serositis was successfully controlled with canakinumab. Four months later from the start of canakinumab treatment, his hip osteoarthritis was required for total hip replacement (THR) because of the traumatic fracture. THR was successfully done and FMF attack was not occurred after this elective surgery. Discontinuation of canakinumab 3 weeks before surgery and resumption 6 weeks after led to favorable outcome without complications. This case addresses the differential management concerning stopping and restating of canakinumab in the perioperative setting in contrast to the other biologics such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or interleukin-6 (IL-6) blocking agents. This case report suggests that canakinumab may represent a safe and effective therapy for the colchicine-resistant FMF, even in the patients requiring THR therapy.

Intrauterine device may trigger typical attacks of familial Mediterranean fever: a case report.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by episodic, recurrent, self-limited attacks of fever and serositis (sterile peritonitis, pleuritis, arthritis, etc). The insufficiency in restriction of mild inflammation contributes this consequence in FMF.Intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been widely used in the world for contraception by gynecologists as an effective and safe method. Herein, we present a woman with FMF as the first case, whose attacks were triggered by copper-containing IUD. Our hypothesis in the present case was that sterile mild inflammation in the uterus caused by copper-containing IUD may be the initial source of systemic inflammatory response.In our opinion, clinicians should consider that the copper-containing IUDs may be another cause of FMF attacks in women using this contraceptive method.

Cisplatin treatment triggers familial Mediterranean fever attacks.

A 42-year-old familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patient who was treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the lung developed severe and frequent attacks of FMF during treatment. Abdominal pain, arthralgia and fever occurred for a few days following each cisplatin cycle. His FMF worsened, the abdominal pain and fever lasted longer and treatment with colchicine was ineffective. It has been hypothesized that the link between cisplatin treatment and FMF attacks lies in an increased production of serotonin, IL-6, IL-1, IL-8 and TNF-alpha. These inflammatory cytokines have been reported to be overproduced during cisplatin treatment and are known to play an important role in FMF relapse. The oncologist should be made aware of the possibility of disease aggravation in FMF patients during cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Mollaret's meningitis. A variant of recurrent hereditary polyserositis, both provoked by metaraminol.

Mollaret's meningitis is a rare condition with a characteristic clinical and cerebrospinal fluid picture. In many ways it resembles recurrent hereditary polyserositis (familial Mediterranean fever) in its natural history, pattern of attacks, and response to colchicine. Association of the two conditions has been reported, so far, in two patients only. In our patient the symptoms of both conditions were induced by a metaraminol provocative infusion. We have previously introduced this as a specific diagnostic and confirmatory test for recurrent hereditary polyserositis. The possibility that the two conditions represent different manifestations of a single disease is therefore strengthened.